Every claim on this page checked against primary sources on
Missouri solar rebates and incentives in 2026
One Missouri utility still pays a solar rebate, and it is a municipal one: Columbia Water and Light pays $500 per kW for the first 10 kW, with a tiered and performance based rebate above that. Every investor-owned utility rebate is closed: Ameren Missouri's schedule ended December 31, 2023, Liberty stopped offering rebates on August 6, 2023, and Evergy has no solar rebate schedule in its filed Missouri West tariff even though its help center still describes one in the present tense with no amount attached. What every Missouri homeowner does get is net metering under the Net Metering and Easy Connection Act, which nets at retail inside each billing period and binds cooperatives and municipal utilities as well as the big companies, plus a property tax exemption that is still printed in the statute book and unenforceable since 2022. Full utility-by-utility detail, with sources and dates, is on its own page. Program rows were checked against each utility's own pages on September 13, 2026; rows carried forward from the July 29, 2026 sweep say so in their verified date.
| Program | Who runs it | What it pays | Status | Source | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Water and Light solar rebate | Columbia Water and Light | $0.50/watt$500 per kW for the first 10 kW, with a tiered and performance based rebate above that, plus a premium rebate for systems designed to perform best during peak periods | Open now | Columbia Water and Light, solar rebates | |
| Set the PACE St. Louis | Missouri Energy Initiative, for the City of St. Louis Clean Energy Development Board | No direct paymentFinancing, not a rebate: 100 percent upfront financing through fixed-rate loans of up to 20 years, repaid through a voluntary assessment that transfers with the property | Open now | Set the PACE St. Louis | |
| Net metering under the Net Metering and Easy Connection Act | Missouri Public Service Commission for electrical corporations; each supplier's governing body for municipals and cooperatives | Bill creditRetail rate-class pricing against your own consumption within each billing period; excess beyond the billing period at a rate at least equal to avoided fuel cost, which differs by supplier (Ameren Missouri 3.84¢/kWh summer and 3.39¢/kWh winter; Evergy Missouri Metro $0.0190/kWh; Evergy Missouri West $0.0198/kWh) | Standing law | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 386.890, Revisor of Statutes of Missouri | |
| Missouri solar property tax exemption — held unconstitutional | County assessors, under the State Tax Commission of Missouri | No direct paymentSection 137.100(10) is still printed in the Revised Statutes but was held unconstitutional by the Missouri Supreme Court on August 9, 2022 and is not enforceable | Gone | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 137.100, Revisor of Statutes of Missouri | |
| Ameren Missouri solar rebate (S.B. 564), expired | Ameren Missouri | $0.25/wattLast rate paid: 25 cents per watt for systems becoming operational between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023, capped at 25 kW for a residential system. The authorizing statute expired December 31, 2023 | Gone. Schedule ended December 31, 2023; the system had to be operational and Sections E and F filed by that date | Ameren Missouri, 2019-2023 Solar Rebates | |
| Evergy Solar Power Rebate (Missouri) | Evergy | No direct paymentEvergy publishes no amount, no cap and no end date for this rebate. The help page describes "a rebate per watt of solar energy generated" and stops there | Gone. Help page still present and written in the present tense, no amount published, and no solar rebate schedule in the filed Missouri West tariff | Evergy help center, What is the Solar Power Rebate? | |
| Liberty (Empire District) solar rebate | Liberty (Empire District) | No direct paymentNo rebate is offered. The last rate was the statutory twenty-five cents per watt under section 393.1670 | Gone. Ended August 6, 2023. Applications already in had until December 31, 2023 to be operational | Liberty, solar for home and business (Missouri) | |
| Evergy Residential Battery Energy Storage Pilot (Schedule RBES) | Evergy Missouri West | No direct paymentEvergy owns, installs, maintains and operates the battery; the participant pays $10.00 per month. Programme cost capped at $2.5 million through December 31, 2025 and limited to 50 residential customers | Gone. Tariff funding cap ran through December 31, 2025. Evergy's own pilot page is still recruiting and says the pilot ends in 2026 | Evergy Missouri West filed tariff, P.S.C. MO. No. 1, Schedule RBES | |
| Federal residential clean energy credit (§ 25D) — 30% of system cost | Internal Revenue Service | 30% of cost | Gone | 26 U.S.C. § 25D, U.S. Code (prelim), Office of the Law Revision Counsel |
Is there still a solar rebate in Missouri?
Yes, in exactly one place. Columbia Water and Light, the municipal utility in Columbia, pays $500 per kW for the first 10 kW with a tiered and performance based rebate above that, and publishes no closing date. Every investor-owned rebate is shut: Ameren Missouri's ran to December 31, 2023, Liberty stopped offering rebates on August 6, 2023, and Evergy has no solar rebate schedule in its filed Missouri West tariff, whatever its rebate help page still says in the present tense. The reason the split exists is in the statutes: sections 393.1030 and 393.1670 bind an "electrical corporation," which means a Commission-regulated investor-owned utility, so neither one ever reached a municipal utility operating under chapter 91. Each utility, with its own amount, status and source, is broken out here.
Verified against primary sources on .
One Missouri utility still pays a solar rebate, and it is the one nobody names. Columbia Water and Light, the municipal utility in Columbia, pays $500 per kW for the first 10 kW with a tiered and performance based rebate above that. The investor-owned utilities are a different story: Ameren Missouri's rebate schedule ended on December 31, 2023, Liberty stopped offering rebates on August 6, 2023, and Evergy has no rebate schedule in its filed Missouri West tariff even though its help center still describes the rebate in the present tense with no amount attached. The two statutes that ended the investor-owned rebates, sections 393.1030 and 393.1670, bind electrical corporations, which is why neither of them reached a municipal utility. Section 137.100(10) of the Revised Statutes still says solar energy systems not held for resale are exempt from property tax; the Missouri Supreme Court held that subdivision unconstitutional in 2022, and the Revisor still prints it with the holding noted underneath. What Missouri gives every homeowner is real and unusually broad: net metering under the Net Metering and Easy Connection Act nets your generation against your consumption at retail inside each billing period, it binds municipal utilities and rural electric cooperatives as well as the investor-owned companies, and the renewable energy certificates start out belonging to you. Above your own consumption the credit drops to avoided fuel cost, and any credit you do not use expires after twelve months for nothing.
What changed in 2026, and what we got wrong before
This page was rebuilt on September 13, 2026 after every Missouri program was re-read from its administering source. Four things moved.
- "Missouri has no utility solar rebate" was wrong. It is true of Ameren Missouri, Evergy and Liberty and false of Columbia Water and Light, which pays $500 per kW for the first 10 kW today. Both statutes that killed the rebates run to electrical corporations, and a municipal utility is not one.
- The rebate statute has a new effective date and a sentence we were not carrying. The Revisor now prints section 393.1030 effective August 28, 2025 under S.B. 4, and its subsection 4 reads: "Nothing in this section shall prevent an electrical corporation from offering rebates after July 1, 2020, through an approved tariff." Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1030 The step-down still ends at zero cents per watt, so the mandate is dead. But the statute permits a voluntary tariff rebate, which is why the accurate sentence is that no Missouri investor-owned utility currently offers one rather than that the law forbids one.
- Liberty's rebate now has a date. Liberty's own Missouri solar page says: "As of Aug. 6, 2023, Liberty no longer offers solar rebates," with a December 31, 2023 operational deadline for applications already in. Liberty, solar for home and business
- The Evergy battery pilot's two sources disagree, and we now print both. The filed tariff caps the pilot at $2.5 million "through December 31, 2025." Schedule RBES Evergy's own battery pilot page, read the same day, is still soliciting applications, still offers a free 16 kWh battery for a $10 monthly fee, and says the pilot "ends in 2026," across both Kansas and Missouri. We are not going to round that to one answer.
What Missouri still gives you
Three entries. Net metering is the statewide one and it is worth more than its export rate suggests, because Missouri nets your generation against your own consumption at retail prices inside every billing period and the statute binds municipal utilities and rural electric cooperatives as well as the investor-owned companies. The other two are local: a live municipal rebate in Columbia, and PACE financing in the City of St. Louis.
Columbia Water and Light solar rebate
$0.50/watt$500 per kW for the first 10 kW, with a tiered and performance based rebate above that, plus a premium rebate for systems designed to perform best during peak periods
The one Missouri utility solar rebate still being paid, and it belongs to a municipal utility: $500 per kW for the first 10 kW, in the City of Columbia only.
When: No opening date, closing date or funding cap published on the program page.
Who qualifies, in full
- WHY IT SURVIVED BOTH STATUTES: sections 393.1030 and 393.1670 bind an "electrical corporation", which is an investor-owned utility regulated by the Public Service Commission. A municipally owned electric utility operating under chapter 91 is not an electrical corporation, so neither statute reached Columbia's rebate
- Columbia Water and Light serves the City of Columbia only. An Ameren Missouri, Evergy or Liberty customer cannot claim it
- The rebate page publishes a solar rebate calculator spreadsheet dated 2025, and gives [email protected] and 573.441.5528 as the contact for the program
- NOT ESTABLISHED: the tier amounts above 10 kW, the application procedure, any funding pool, any waitlist and any closing date. The page states none of them and we are not going to infer them
- NOT ESTABLISHED: whether the rebate reaches a leased or third-party-owned system. The page states no ownership condition in either direction, which is why this entry carries no ownership rule rather than a guessed one
- A STALE LINE ON THE SAME PAGE, RECORDED DELIBERATELY: Columbia still prints "30% through 2032, 26% in 2033, and 24% in 2034" for the federal credit, which is wrong after the repeal of section 25D. It is a sign the page is not closely maintained, so this row is rechecked on the shortest interval on the Missouri file
What we saw: Read on 2026-09-13 from the City of Columbia's own utility site, page last modified 2025-03-18. The page states a rebate of $500 per kW and describes a tiered, performance based rebate above the first 10 kW plus a "premium rebate for solar systems designed to perform best during peak periods". It states no program status, no funding pool, no waitlist and no application procedure, and the tier amounts above 10 kW were not captured in the fetched text; the first-10-kW boundary comes from Columbia's own program description. Contact given on the page: [email protected], 573.441.5528. The same page still prints the pre-repeal federal credit schedule "30% through 2032, 26% in 2033, and 24% in 2034". Related primary document seen but not read in this pass: Columbia's Solar NMA Guidelines 2024 interconnection and net metering guidelines PDF, dated October 2024.
Administered by Columbia Water and Light, the municipal electric utility of the City of Columbia.
Checked against Columbia Water and Light, solar rebates on
Set the PACE St. Louis
No direct paymentFinancing, not a rebate: 100 percent upfront financing through fixed-rate loans of up to 20 years, repaid through a voluntary assessment that transfers with the property
Financing rather than money off, and only inside the City of St. Louis: a PACE assessment that funds the whole system up front and stays with the property when you sell.
Who qualifies, in full
- IT IS A LOAN, NOT AN INCENTIVE. Property Assessed Clean Energy is described by the program as "a financing mechanism for property owners to pay for energy efficiency and renewable energy measures, as authorized by Missouri state statute". It lowers nothing about the price of a system
- The program offers "100% upfront financing for eligible improvements through fixed-rate loans for up to 20 years", repaid through a voluntary assessment on the property that transfers with the property on sale
- Administered by the Missouri Energy Initiative for the City of St. Louis Clean Energy Development Board, so the boundary is the City of St. Louis
- NOT ESTABLISHED: the residential terms. The site is commercial-heavy; residential eligibility is stated but not detailed, and no residential rate, fee schedule or minimum project size was published
- The working domain is setthepacestlouis.com. The setthepacestl.com domain quoted in some guides does not resolve
Authority: Property Assessed Clean Energy, as authorized by Missouri statute; the program cites the authorization rather than a section number
What we saw: Read on 2026-09-13. The site describes PACE as "a financing mechanism for property owners to pay for energy efficiency and renewable energy measures, as authorized by Missouri state statute" and offers "100% upfront financing for eligible improvements through fixed-rate loans for up to 20 years", repaid through a voluntary property tax assessment that transfers with the property. Administration by the Missouri Energy Initiative for the City of St. Louis Clean Energy Development Board is stated on the site. The most recent item on the site is a 2022 award. No residential rate sheet or fee schedule was published. The setthepacestl.com domain does not resolve.
Administered by Missouri Energy Initiative, for the City of St. Louis Clean Energy Development Board.
Checked against Set the PACE St. Louis on
Net metering under the Net Metering and Easy Connection Act
Bill creditRetail rate-class pricing against your own consumption within each billing period; excess beyond the billing period at a rate at least equal to avoided fuel cost, which differs by supplier (Ameren Missouri 3.84¢/kWh summer and 3.39¢/kWh winter; Evergy Missouri Metro $0.0190/kWh; Evergy Missouri West $0.0198/kWh)
The one thing Missouri still gives a new solar owner, and it is worth more than its export rate suggests: full retail netting inside each billing period, binding on co-ops and municipals as well as the big utilities.
When: Standing statutory scheme, in force since January 1, 2008 and last amended effective August 28, 2022.
Who qualifies, in full
- OWNERSHIP IS PERMISSIVE, UNLIKE INDIANA'S: a "customer-generator" is "the owner or operator" of a qualified unit, and the unit must be located on a premises "owned, operated, leased, or otherwise controlled by the customer-generator." Both the operator and a leased premises are inside the statutory definition
- System capacity of not more than one hundred kilowatts, powered by a renewable energy resource, and intended primarily to offset part or all of your own electrical energy requirements
- COVERS MUNICIPALS AND COOPERATIVES: "retail electric supplier" means any municipally owned electric utility operating under chapter 91, any electrical corporation regulated by the Commission, or any rural electric cooperative operating under chapter 394
- Your supplier must offer a tariff identical in energy rates, rate structure and monthly charges to the one you would get if you were not a customer-generator, and may not charge any additional standby, capacity, interconnection or other fee that a non-generating customer would not pay
- THE TWELVE-MONTH TRAP: any credit granted "shall expire without any compensation at the earlier of either twelve months after their issuance or when the customer-generator disconnects service or terminates the net metering relationship with the supplier." There is no annual cash-out and no indefinite carry-forward
- Systems of ten kilowatts or less cannot be required to install additional controls, perform or pay for additional tests or distribution equipment, or buy additional liability insurance beyond the code standards and the metering rules
- Application response is due within thirty days for systems of ten kilowatts or less and ninety days for larger ones; an approved application expires if the interconnection is not completed within one year
- A SECOND TRAP, ON SALE OF THE HOUSE: "Upon the change in ownership of a qualified electric energy generation unit, the new customer-generator shall be responsible for filing a new application." Missouri net metering does not transfer with the property the way Indiana's grandfathered tariffs do
- You pay for metering equipment the supplier has to add, though the supplier may front the cost and recover it with reasonable interest over up to twelve billing cycles; later meter testing or changes you necessitate are also yours
- Aggregate availability is first-come, first-served to five percent of the supplier's previous-year single-hour peak load, with a separate rule that no supplier need approve further interconnections in a calendar year once that year's approvals reach one percent of the previous year's peak
- The sale of a generation unit is subject to Missouri's merchandising practices law, sections 407.010 to 407.145 and 407.700 to 407.720, and the attorney general may make rules on mandatory seller disclosures and investigate misrepresentation of safety or performance
- NOT VERIFIED HERE: the avoided fuel cost figure at The Empire District Electric Company d/b/a Liberty, or at any individual municipal utility or rural electric cooperative. Each cooperative and municipal sets its own through its own governing body
Authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. § 386.890
What we saw: Re-read at the Revisor on 2026-09-13: the section is still printed effective August 28, 2022 from A.L. 2022 S.B. 745 merged with S.B. 820, and the definition of "retail electric supplier", the avoided fuel cost credit, the twelve-month expiry and the five percent single-hour peak load cap are all unchanged from the 2026-07-29 read recorded below. Section read in full on 2026-07-29 from the Revisor of Statutes of Missouri, version effective 28 Aug 2022 (L. 2007 S.B. 54, A.L. 2018 S.B. 975 & 1024 Revision, A.L. 2022 S.B. 745 merged with S.B. 820). Subsection 2(1) verbatim: "'Avoided fuel cost', the current average cost of fuel for the entity generating electricity, as defined by the governing body with jurisdiction over any municipal electric utility, rural electric cooperative as provided in chapter 394, or electrical corporation as provided in this chapter". Subsection 2(3) defines "customer-generator" as "the owner or operator of a qualified electric energy generation unit which: (a) Is powered by a renewable energy resource; (b) Has an electrical generating system with a capacity of not more than one hundred kilowatts; (c) Is located on a premises owned, operated, leased, or otherwise controlled by the customer-generator". Subsection 2(5) defines "Net metering" as "using metering equipment sufficient to measure the difference between the electrical energy supplied to a customer-generator by a retail electric supplier and the electrical energy supplied by the customer-generator to the retail electric supplier over the applicable billing period". Subsection 2(7) defines "Retail electric supplier" as "any municipally owned electric utility operating under chapter 91, electrical corporation regulated by the commission under this chapter, or rural electric cooperative operating under chapter 394 that provides retail electric service in this state." Subsection 3(1) carries both the five percent first-come cap and the sentence "However, in a given calendar year, no retail electric supplier shall be required to approve any application for interconnection if the total rated generating capacity of all applications for interconnection already approved to date by said supplier in said calendar year equals or exceeds one percent of said supplier's single-hour peak load for the previous calendar year". Subsection 5(2) bills the customer for net electricity supplied "in accordance with normal practices for customers in the same rate class"; 5(3) credits excess "an amount at least equal to the avoided fuel cost of the excess kilowatt-hours generated during the billing period, with this credit applied to the following billing period"; 5(4) verbatim: "Any credits granted by this subsection shall expire without any compensation at the earlier of either twelve months after their issuance or when the customer-generator disconnects service or terminates the net metering relationship with the supplier". Subsection 7(1) sets the thirty-day and ninety-day review periods and the one-year approval expiry; 7(2) verbatim: "Upon the change in ownership of a qualified electric energy generation unit, the new customer-generator shall be responsible for filing a new application under subdivision (1) of this subsection." Subsection 13 subjects unit sales to sections 407.010 to 407.145 and 407.700 to 407.720.
Administered by Missouri Public Service Commission for electrical corporations; each supplier's governing body for municipals and cooperatives.
Checked against Mo. Rev. Stat. § 386.890, Revisor of Statutes of Missouri on
Net metering and net billing in Missouri
Missouri's Net Metering and Easy Connection Act is unusual in two ways that matter more than its rate. The first is who it binds. Section 386.890 defines "retail electric supplier" to include any municipally owned electric utility operating under chapter 91 and any rural electric cooperative operating under chapter 394, alongside the investor-owned electrical corporations the Public Service Commission regulates — so unlike Indiana, Ohio and Georgia, a Missouri co-op or municipal customer is inside the statute rather than outside it. What the Commission does not do is set the number for them: "avoided fuel cost" is defined as the current average cost of fuel for the generating entity "as defined by the governing body with jurisdiction," which for a co-op or a municipal is its own board. The second is the netting. The statute measures the difference between what the supplier delivers and what the customer delivers "over the applicable billing period," and if the supplier's electricity exceeds the customer's generation in that period the customer is simply billed for the net at ordinary rate-class prices. That is full retail netting inside the month. Only what is left over after a whole billing period is exported at avoided fuel cost, and avoided fuel cost is a narrower thing than avoided cost — it is fuel, not capacity, not transmission, not the retail rate. Then comes the part that catches people: any credit granted expires without compensation twelve months after it is issued, or when the customer disconnects or ends the net metering relationship, whichever comes first. There is no annual cash-out. A system oversized against winter production banks credit it may never spend.
| System size | Which utilities | What you are paid for exports |
|---|---|---|
| Systems up to 100 kW, all suppliers | Investor-owned, municipal and cooperative | Generation offsets consumption at ordinary rate-class prices within each billing period. Excess beyond the billing period is credited at a rate at least equal to the avoided fuel cost of the excess kilowatt-hours, applied to the following billing period. Credits expire without compensation twelve months after issuance, or on disconnection or termination of the net metering relationship. |
| Ameren Missouri — published export credit | Ameren Missouri (Union Electric) | 3.84 cents per kWh in the summer billing months of June through September, and 3.39 cents per kWh in the winter billing months of October through May. Ameren also caps system size by a stated formula: the most recent twelve billing months of load divided by 8,760 hours times a 15.6% capacity factor, evaluated against the account's actual usage on application. |
| Evergy Missouri Metro — filed export rate | Evergy Metro, Inc. | $0.0190 per kWh for all kilowatt-hours received, under Schedule PG, Parallel Generation Contract Service, 16th Revised Sheet No. 31A, effective February 21, 2025. The net metering tariff does not print the number itself; it points at this sheet. |
| Evergy Missouri West — filed export rate | Evergy Missouri West, Inc. | $0.0198 per kWh for all kilowatt-hours received, under Schedule PG, Parallel Generation Contract Service, effective February 21, 2025. Missouri West's net metering tariff also states that it is not available to customers participating in Time-Related Pricing, a restriction Evergy Missouri Metro does not carry. |
| The first-come cap, and the annual throttle inside it | All retail electric suppliers | Net metering must be offered first-come, first-served until enrolled net metering capacity reaches five percent of the supplier's single-hour peak load in the previous year, after which the Commission (for an electrical corporation) or the supplier's own governing body may raise it. Separately, no supplier is required to approve any further interconnection in a calendar year once approvals already granted that year reach one percent of the previous year's single-hour peak load. The second limit can close a utility's queue for a year while the five percent headroom is still unfilled. |
| Municipal utilities and rural electric cooperatives | Chapter 91 municipals and chapter 394 cooperatives | Covered by the Act on the same terms, and required since 2008 to adopt a simple interconnection and net metering contract, with an all-in-one document for systems of ten kilowatts or less. But their avoided fuel cost is set by their own governing body rather than by the Commission, and where the wholesale generator agrees the credit may be provided by that wholesale generator instead. No individual municipal or cooperative's number was read for this page. |
Read from Mo. Rev. Stat. § 386.890, Revisor of Statutes of Missouri on .
Missouri's net metering law covers co-ops and municipals — which is rare
On every other state page on this site, cooperatives and municipal utilities sit outside the statute and set their own terms. Indiana excludes them from the definition of "electricity supplier"; Ohio does not require them to offer net metering at all. Missouri wrote the opposite rule, and it is in the definition rather than in a program condition, which is also why Columbia Water and Light can pay a rebate that the two rebate statutes shut down everywhere else.
"Retail electric supplier" or "supplier", any municipally owned electric utility operating under chapter 91, electrical corporation regulated by the commission under this chapter, or rural electric cooperative operating under chapter 394 that provides retail electric service in this state.
Every operative duty in the Act runs to a "retail electric supplier," so a Missouri co-op member and a municipal utility customer get the same statutory entitlement as an Ameren or Evergy customer: net metering must be made available, the tariff must be identical to the one they would otherwise be on, no extra standby or interconnection fees, and a simple all-in-one application for systems of ten kilowatts or less.
There is a real limit on this, and it is worth being precise rather than triumphal. The rate is not uniform. "Avoided fuel cost" is defined as the current average cost of fuel for the generating entity "as defined by the governing body with jurisdiction" — which for an investor-owned utility means the Public Service Commission, and for a co-op or municipal means its own board or council. So the entitlement is statewide and the number is local. If you are served by a cooperative or a city utility, the question to ask is not whether you can net meter, but what your board has set avoided fuel cost at.
Two traps in the fine print, and neither is about the rate
The export rate gets all the attention. These two cost more.
Credits expire after twelve months, for nothing. The statute says any credit granted "shall expire without any compensation at the earlier of either twelve months after their issuance or when the customer-generator disconnects service or terminates the net metering relationship with the supplier." There is no annual true-up cheque and no indefinite carry-forward. Ohio at least lets credits ride forever; Missouri gives them a twelve-month life and then takes them. A system deliberately oversized to bank summer production against winter bills can bank credit it never spends, and the utility keeps it. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 386.890.5(4)
It does not transfer with the house. "Upon the change in ownership of a qualified electric energy generation unit, the new customer-generator shall be responsible for filing a new application." Indiana's grandfathered tariffs pass to a successor in interest at the same premises, so an Indiana system is an asset you can disclose when selling. A Missouri buyer starts a new application, subject to whatever the queue and the caps look like on the day they file. That is a question worth raising before closing, not after.
Missouri's ownership rule is the friendliest we have found
Indiana put "owned by the customer" into the statutory definition of the thing being compensated, which we described as the hardest ownership line on this site. Missouri's definition, in the same structural position, does the reverse.
"Customer-generator", the owner or operator of a qualified electric energy generation unit which: (a) Is powered by a renewable energy resource; (b) Has an electrical generating system with a capacity of not more than one hundred kilowatts; (c) Is located on a premises owned, operated, leased, or otherwise controlled by the customer-generator; ... (e) Is intended primarily to offset part or all of the customer-generator's own electrical energy requirements.
"The owner or operator," on premises "owned, operated, leased, or otherwise controlled." Both halves are permissive, and the word "leased" appears in the text rather than having to be argued into it. The national buy-versus-lease picture is here — and Missouri sits at the opposite end of it from Indiana. We are stating what the definition says rather than predicting how any particular lease or power purchase agreement would be treated, but a Missouri homeowner considering third-party ownership is starting from friendlier statutory language than a homeowner in most of the states on this site.
Can you sell SRECs in Missouri?
Yes. Missouri is one of the few states left where a homeowner starts out owning the certificates and there is still a compliance buyer for them. Proposition C, adopted by initiative on November 4, 2008 and now section 393.1030, sets a renewable energy portfolio requirement of no less than fifteen percent of each electric utility's sales in every calendar year beginning in 2021, with no later benchmark and no termination date in the section — the direct contrast with Ohio, whose table simply stops after 2026. At least two percent of each portfolio requirement must be derived from solar energy, so there is a solar-specific obligation rather than a general renewable one. Each kilowatt-hour of eligible energy generated in Missouri counts as 1.25 kilowatt-hours for compliance, an in-state premium. And subsection 3 says in terms that "Certificates from net-metered sources shall initially be owned by the customer-generator" — the same question California and Georgia had to leave unanswered, settled here in a voter-approved statute rather than a rule. Both Evergy Missouri tariffs repeat it: RECs created by the customer-owner are owned by the customer-generator, except that a customer who took a solar rebate transferred them to the utility for ten years. Since the rebates ended, that exception no longer applies to anyone installing today. Two limits are worth knowing: an unused credit may exist for only three years from creation, and compliance costs are capped by a maximum average retail rate increase of one percent, which is the lever utilities have used to limit what they spend. NOT VERIFIED HERE: how a Missouri homeowner actually registers and sells certificates. We established that the demand exists and that the certificates are yours; we did not establish a tracking registry, an aggregator, or a price a household can transact at, and we are not going to imply a market a homeowner can reach until we have read one.
Read from Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1030 (renewable energy portfolio requirement, adopted by Proposition C) on .
Missouri still has a compliance market, and the certificates start out yours
This is the part of Missouri that nobody covers, and it survives for an unusual reason: it was adopted by the voters rather than by the legislature. Proposition C passed on November 4, 2008 and is now section 393.1030, the same section that carries the dead rebate schedule.
Three things in it matter to a household. The portfolio requirement is at least fifteen percent of sales in every calendar year beginning in 2021, with no later benchmark and no termination date in the section, unlike Ohio, whose benchmark table simply stops after 2026. At least two percent of the requirement must come from solar specifically, so the demand is solar-shaped rather than generic. And energy generated inside Missouri counts at 1.25 kilowatt-hours per kilowatt-hour for compliance. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1030
Then there is the sentence that answers the question California and Georgia both had to leave open. Subsection 3 provides that "Certificates from net-metered sources shall initially be owned by the customer-generator." Both Evergy Missouri tariffs repeat it, and both carry the single exception: a customer who accepted a solar rebate transferred the certificates to the utility for ten years. Since the rebates ended, that exception cannot apply to anyone installing today.
Why Missouri has no solar tax credit, in the state's own words
The Missouri Department of Revenue's 2025 MO-1040 instruction booklet runs to fifty-three pages and includes the Form MO-TC credit table, which enumerates every credit an individual may claim by alpha code and by administering agency. Across the whole booklet the word "solar" appears zero times. The word "energy" appears once, as the Department of Natural Resources' Processed Wood Energy credit. Missouri DOR, 2025 MO-1040 instructions
Sales tax is the other question people arrive with, and the short answer is that Missouri's exemption is written around purchases by a company rather than by a household, and the Department's only published ruling applying it concerned a utility-scale solar farm. Missouri DOR Letter Ruling 8258 We are not going to infer the residential answer in either direction. The full reading of section 144.030.2(46) and of the letter ruling is on the property tax page, where it sits with the rest of the Missouri tax picture.
What is gone, and when each one went
Six entries, each with a date on it. Liberty stopped offering rebates on August 6, 2023; Ameren Missouri's schedule ran out on December 31, 2023; Evergy has a rebate help page in the present tense and no rebate schedule on file; the property tax exemption fell to a court in 2022 and is still printed; the federal credit ended with 2025; and the only residential battery program was fifty houses whose tariff funding cap ran to the end of 2025 while the utility's own page keeps recruiting.
Missouri solar property tax exemption — held unconstitutional
No direct paymentSection 137.100(10) is still printed in the Revised Statutes but was held unconstitutional by the Missouri Supreme Court on August 9, 2022 and is not enforceable
Still in the statute book, still listed by most solar guides, and struck down four years ago — the exemption a Missouri homeowner is most likely to be told they have.
When: Held unconstitutional August 9, 2022. Still printed in the Revised Statutes.
Who qualifies, in full
- WHAT THE STATUTE STILL SAYS: section 137.100 lists property exempt from taxation for state, county or local purposes, and subdivision (10) reads in its entirety "Solar energy systems not held for resale"
- WHY IT DOES NOT WORK: in Johnson v. Springfield Solar 1, LLC, 648 S.W.3d 101, decided August 9, 2022, the Missouri Supreme Court held that subdivision unconstitutional under article X, section 6 of the Missouri Constitution, which limits tax exemptions to specifically enumerated property. The Revisor of Statutes prints the holding as an annotation directly beneath the section
- THE STATE TAX COMMISSION'S OWN ANSWER FOR A HOUSE: its assessor manual asks what happens when a taxpayer has solar panels installed on the roof of a home to generate power for use in and around the home, and answers that "In the assessor's discretion based upon the facts known to the assessor, the solar panels could be considered to be a fixture of the home if attached to the home. The value of the fixture would be contributory to the overall value of the residential property and not valued separately"
- So a Missouri rooftop system can add to the assessed value of the home, it is generally not assessed as a separate line, and the outcome turns on a locally elected assessor's discretion rather than on a statewide rule
- The Commission is explicit that there is no methodology in statute: "While no current statute specifically provides a methodology for assessment and taxation of solar energy systems, county officials may look to general statutes governing the assessment and taxation of real property and personal property and relevant case law to help guide them"
- WHAT THE LEGISLATURE DID INSTEAD, AND WHY IT DOES NOT HELP A NEW BUYER: Senate Bill 4 of 2025, signed and effective August 28, 2025, amended sections 137.010, 137.080 and 137.115 to create a new subclass of tangible personal property covering solar panels, racking systems, inverters and related equipment installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems as described in section 144.030.2(46), assessed at five percent of true value — but only for systems "that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022," the date of the decision. It is a grandfather for systems already running, not a rule for anyone installing now
- A task force was created to fix this: section 393.1072 established the Task Force on Fair, Nondiscriminatory Local Taxation Concerning Solar Energy Systems, which was to report before December 31, 2022. That section expired December 31, 2022 by its own terms
- NOT VERIFIED HERE: how individual county assessors are in fact treating residential rooftop systems in 2026. The Commission's guidance is discretionary by design and we did not survey counties
- NOT VERIFIED HERE: whether the 2025 personal property subclass can reach a residential rooftop system that was producing before August 9, 2022. It cross-references a sales tax provision written around purchases by a company, and the Commission's own guidance treats residential rooftop panels as a fixture of real property rather than as personal property
Authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. § 137.100(10), held unconstitutional by Johnson v. Springfield Solar 1, LLC, 648 S.W.3d 101 (Mo. banc 2022); cf. §§ 137.010, 137.080, 137.115 as amended by S.B. 4 (2025)
What we saw: Section 137.100 read on 2026-07-29 from the Revisor of Statutes of Missouri, version effective 28 Aug 2013. Subdivision (10) is printed in the operative list of exempt subjects and reads, in full, "Solar energy systems not held for resale." The annotation printed beneath the section reads verbatim: "(2022) Section exempting solar energy systems not held for resale from property taxation is unconstitutional under article X, § 6 limitation of tax exemptions to specifically enumerated property. Johnson v. Springfield Solar 1, LLC, 648 S.W.3d 101 (Mo.banc)." The State Tax Commission of Missouri's Assessor Manual chapter 7.11, "Assessment of Solar Property," revision date March 8, 2023, read as a PDF the same day, opens: "On August 9, 2022, the Missouri Supreme Court issued its decision in Brent Johnson, et al., v. Springfield Solar 1, LLC, et al., (SC99441) holding that the exemption for 'solar energy systems not held for resale' under Section 137.100(10) is unconstitutional." Its Question 1 and Answer 1 are quoted in the eligibility list above verbatim. The manual also states that the task force under section 393.1072 issued its report and that "no such legislation was enacted or effective as of the January 1, 2023, reassessment date." Sections 137.080 and 137.115 read the same day: 137.080 lists as new personal property subclass (7) "Solar panels, racking systems, inverters, and related solar equipment, components, materials, and supplies installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems, as described in subdivision (46) of subsection 2 of section 144.030, that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022", with amendment history ending "A.L. 2025 S.B. 4"; 137.115 assigns that subclass "five percent." Section 393.1072 read the same day carries "6. This section shall expire on December 31, 2022." Senate Bill 214 of 2025, which would have set a $500 per megawatt liability cap and a new assessor valuation rule from January 1, 2026, was second read and referred to committee and did not become law; section 137.077, which that bill would have created, does not exist in the Revised Statutes.
Administered by County assessors, under the State Tax Commission of Missouri.
Checked against Mo. Rev. Stat. § 137.100, Revisor of Statutes of Missouri on
Ameren Missouri solar rebate (S.B. 564), expired
Schedule ended December 31, 2023; the system had to be operational and Sections E and F filed by that date
$0.25/wattcapped at $6,250 · Last rate paid: 25 cents per watt for systems becoming operational between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023, capped at 25 kW for a residential system. The authorizing statute expired December 31, 2023
Dead twice over: the Proposition C schedule fell to zero cents per watt after June 2020, and the replacement rebate statute expired at the end of 2023. Both statutes bind investor-owned utilities, so neither one reached Columbia's municipal rebate.
When: Statutory rebate zero cents per watt for systems operational after June 30, 2020. Section 393.1670 expired December 31, 2023.
Who qualifies, in full
- THE PROPOSITION C SCHEDULE RAN OUT FIRST. Section 393.1030.4 sets the statutory rebate by operational date: two dollars per watt on or before June 30, 2014, stepping down through fifty cents, then twenty-five cents per watt between July 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020, and "zero cents per watt for systems becoming operational after June 30, 2020"
- THE REPLACEMENT STATUTE HAS ALSO EXPIRED. Section 393.1670, enacted in 2018, required electrical corporations to pay fifty cents per watt for systems operational between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2019 and twenty-five cents per watt for systems operational after June 30, 2019 through December 31, 2023. Subsection 7 reads: "This section shall expire on December 31, 2023"
- It was capped at twenty-five kilowatts per system for residential customers and one hundred fifty kilowatts for non-residential, and each utility had an aggregate dollar ceiling: twenty-eight million dollars for corporations with a million or more Missouri retail customers, eight million for those between two hundred thousand and a million, seven million for those at or below two hundred thousand
- THE PRICE OF TAKING ONE, IF YOU DID: as a condition of the rebate the customer transferred to the utility all right, title and interest in the renewable energy certificates associated with the system for ten years. Both Evergy Missouri tariffs still carry that clause, and it is the only circumstance in which a Missouri customer-generator does not own their own certificates
- THE STATUTE DOES NOT FORBID A FUTURE ONE. Section 393.1030, now printed effective August 28, 2025 from A.L. 2025 S.B. 4, carries in subsection 4 the sentence "Nothing in this section shall prevent an electrical corporation from offering rebates after July 1, 2020, through an approved tariff." The mandate is dead; a voluntary tariff rebate is expressly permitted. So the accurate statement is that no Missouri investor-owned utility currently offers one, not that the law prohibits one
- Ameren Missouri's rebate ran on the same statute and the same schedule, twenty-eight million dollars over five years, fifty cents per watt for the first half of 2019 and twenty-five cents per watt thereafter, capped at twenty-five kilowatts for a residential customer, with $0.4 million in the final 2023 year
- THE DEADLINE WAS OPERATIONAL, NOT CONTRACTUAL. Ameren's own pages state that a system had to be installed, with Sections E and F and any municipal inspection submitted, before December 31, 2023, and that systems not meeting those requirements by that date are not eligible
- NEITHER STATUTE REACHED A MUNICIPAL OR A COOPERATIVE. Both bind an "electrical corporation". Columbia Water and Light still pays a solar rebate today, which is why the blanket statement that Missouri utility rebates are dead is wrong as a statewide claim
- NOT VERIFIED HERE: whether any Missouri rural electric cooperative offers a solar rebate of its own. The Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives site carries no rebate list and no solar incentive page, and individual cooperative sites were not swept one by one
Authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1670 (expired December 31, 2023); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1030.4
What we saw: Re-fetched on 2026-09-13: Ameren Missouri's "2019-2023 SOLAR REBATES" document is still live and still prints the schedule "January 1, 2019-June 30, 2019 -- $0.50 per watt" and "July 1, 2019-December 31, 2023 -- $0.25 per watt", a maximum residential system size of 25 kW, and funding of $28 million over five years with $0.4 million in the final 2023 year. No date is printed on the PDF itself. Ameren Missouri's customer-owned solar pages name no rebate available today. Section 393.1030 was re-read at the Revisor the same day and is now printed effective August 28, 2025 from A.L. 2025 S.B. 4; its subsection 4 permits a voluntary tariff rebate after July 1, 2020. Recorded deliberately after a plan assumption was checked and failed: Ameren's "Smart Inverter Rebate" of $300 per kW-DC and $300 per kWh is an Ameren Illinois program, offered to DS-1, DS-2, DS-3 and DS-4 Illinois rate classes, and the June 1, 2026 five-rate-option change sits inside the Illinois Rider NM discussion. Neither belongs on a Missouri page. Section 393.1670 read on 2026-07-29 from the Revisor of Statutes of Missouri, version effective 28 Aug 2018. Subsection 1 verbatim: "For systems becoming operational between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019, the solar rebate shall be fifty cents per watt, and for systems that become operational after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2023, the solar rebate shall be twenty-five cents per watt." Subsection 7 verbatim: "This section shall expire on December 31, 2023; provided however, that after such expiration, the electrical corporation shall be entitled to recover any remaining regulatory asset balance as provided in subsection 2 of this section." Section 393.1030.4, read the same day in the version effective 28 Aug 2025, ends its rebate schedule "and zero cents per watt for systems becoming operational after June 30, 2020" and continues "Nothing in this section shall prevent an electrical corporation from offering rebates after July 1, 2020, through an approved tariff", and conditions any rebate on the customer transferring "all right, title, and interest in and to the renewable energy credits associated with the new or expanded solar electric system ... for a period of ten years". Evergy Missouri West's complete filed tariff (P.S.C. MO. No. 1) was downloaded from evergy.com and its table of contents read in full: no solar rebate schedule appears; the sole rebate schedule listed is "Commercial EV Charger Rebate CECR 161". Evergy Missouri Metro's complete filed tariff (P.S.C. MO. No. 7) contains "SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC REBATE PROGRAM, Schedule SR, 393.1670 RSMo (2019-2023)", issued August 27, 2018 and effective October 15, 2018, whose condition 6 reads: "The System or expansion of an existing System must not become operational until after December 31, 2018 and must become operational on or before December 31, 2023." Ameren Missouri's own "2019-2023 SOLAR REBATES" document, read as a PDF the same day, states the rebates are "part of the Smart Energy Plan (SB564)", "$28 million dollars over 5 years", "January 1, 2019-June 30, 2019--$0.50 per watt", "July 1, 2019-December 31, 2023--$0.25 per watt", and "Maximum solar system size for a solar rebate for a Residential customer is 25 kW". Ameren's current customer-owned solar FAQ answers the question "Are there Solar Rebates?" only with a link for customers who already submitted applications to check status. CONTRADICTING SOURCE, RECORDED DELIBERATELY: Evergy's own help center page "What is the Solar Power Rebate?", read the same day, still states in the present tense that "The solar power rebate encourages an investment in solar technology by providing a rebate per watt of solar energy generated. The rebate is available for residential and business customers in Missouri", with no dates and no amount. Evergy's main private solar and net metering program page describes only net metering and parallel generation and mentions no rebate.
Administered by Ameren Missouri (Union Electric Company), under the Missouri Public Service Commission.
Checked against Ameren Missouri, 2019-2023 Solar Rebates on
Evergy Solar Power Rebate (Missouri)
Help page still present and written in the present tense, no amount published, and no solar rebate schedule in the filed Missouri West tariff
No direct paymentEvergy publishes no amount, no cap and no end date for this rebate. The help page describes "a rebate per watt of solar energy generated" and stops there
The rebate page is still up and still written in the present tense, with no amount on it and no rebate schedule in the filed tariff. Read the tariff, not the help center.
When: No window published. The Missouri Metro schedule required a system operational on or before December 31, 2023.
Who qualifies, in full
- WHAT THE HELP PAGE SAYS: "The solar power rebate encourages an investment in solar technology by providing a rebate per watt of solar energy generated. The rebate is available for residential and business customers in Missouri." No amount, no cap, no status, no end date
- WHAT THE FILED TARIFF SAYS: Evergy Missouri West's complete tariff book, P.S.C. MO. No. 1, has no solar rebate schedule in its table of contents. The solar and storage schedules on file are the Solar Subscription Rider, the Low-Income Solar Subscription Pilot Rider, the Renewable Energy Rider, the Renewable Energy Program Rider, the net metering interconnection agreement, Parallel Generation Contract Service, the Customer Capacity Rider and the Residential Battery Energy Storage Pilot
- Evergy Missouri Metro's filed tariff, P.S.C. MO. No. 7, still prints Schedule SR, the Solar Photovoltaic Rebate Program, headed "393.1670 RSMo (2019-2023)", but its own condition 6 requires that a system "must become operational on or before December 31, 2023". The sheet is on file; its window is shut
- The companion help page "Why are Solar Power Rebates only offered in Missouri?" is also present tense: "The rebate program is mandated for Missouri investor-owned utilities, such as Evergy, as part of Missouri's Proposition-C referendum." The mandate it refers to is the one that fell to zero cents per watt after June 30, 2020
- The page the help center forwards to for rebate detail, Evergy's renewable resources page, contains no rebate detail
- NOT ESTABLISHED: whether Evergy intends to file a voluntary rebate tariff under section 393.1030.4, which expressly permits one. Nothing on file says so
Authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1670 (expired December 31, 2023); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1030.4
What we saw: Read on 2026-09-13. The help page is still live, carries no date, and describes the rebate entirely in the present tense with no amount, no cap and no end date. Evergy Missouri West's complete filed tariff PDF, P.S.C. MO. No. 1, was re-fetched the same day and its schedule list read in full: no solar rebate schedule appears. The tariff book's adoption notice is dated September 6, 2019, effective October 7, 2019. Evergy Missouri Metro, P.S.C. MO. No. 7, and its Schedule SR were not re-read on 2026-09-13; the account of Schedule SR here is carried forward unchanged from the 2026-07-29 read of the complete Metro tariff, in which condition 6 reads "The System or expansion of an existing System must not become operational until after December 31, 2018 and must become operational on or before December 31, 2023." The URL https://www.evergy.com/manage-account/rates-and-regulations/tariffs returns 404; the Missouri West tariff PDF was reached directly.
Administered by Evergy Missouri Metro and Evergy Missouri West, under the Missouri Public Service Commission.
Checked against Evergy help center, What is the Solar Power Rebate? on
Liberty (Empire District) solar rebate
Ended August 6, 2023. Applications already in had until December 31, 2023 to be operational
No direct paymentNo rebate is offered. The last rate was the statutory twenty-five cents per watt under section 393.1670
Gone, with a date on it: Liberty stopped offering solar rebates on August 6, 2023, and systems already applied for had to be operational by December 31, 2023.
When: Closed to new applications on August 6, 2023.
Who qualifies, in full
- Liberty's Missouri solar page states it verbatim: "As of Aug. 6, 2023, Liberty no longer offers solar rebates."
- For applications received and completed before that date, "the Customer-Generator System must be operational before Dec. 31, 2023"
- NET METERING CONTINUES. It runs under Tariff Schedule NM; the application sits in the Net Metering Rider on Liberty's Missouri Electric Rate page, and completed forms go to Liberty, ATTN: ENERGY SERVICES/NET METERING, PO Box 127, Joplin MO 64802
- NOT VERIFIED HERE: Liberty's avoided fuel cost figure, which sets what its net metering customers are paid for exported power beyond a billing period. The Net Metering Rider PDF was identified but not read
Authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1670 (expired December 31, 2023)
What we saw: Read on 2026-09-13 from Liberty's own Missouri solar page. Verbatim: "As of Aug. 6, 2023, Liberty no longer offers solar rebates." For applications received and completed before that date, "the Customer-Generator System must be operational before Dec. 31, 2023." The page names Tariff Schedule NM as the continuing net metering tariff and gives the mailing address Liberty, ATTN: ENERGY SERVICES/NET METERING, PO Box 127, Joplin MO 64802. The Net Metering Rider PDF at central.libertyutilities.com/uploads/MO_ELE_4.12_NM%202-2025.pdf was identified on the page but not read in this pass, so Liberty's avoided fuel cost figure is still not established.
Administered by The Empire District Electric Company d/b/a Liberty, under the Missouri Public Service Commission.
Checked against Liberty, solar for home and business (Missouri) on
Evergy Residential Battery Energy Storage Pilot (Schedule RBES)
Tariff funding cap ran through December 31, 2025. Evergy's own pilot page is still recruiting and says the pilot ends in 2026
No direct paymentEvergy owns, installs, maintains and operates the battery; the participant pays $10.00 per month. Programme cost capped at $2.5 million through December 31, 2025 and limited to 50 residential customers
Missouri's only residential battery program is fifty houses, the utility keeps the battery, and the two sources disagree: the tariff caps funding through December 31, 2025, while Evergy's own pilot page is still recruiting and says the pilot ends in 2026.
When: Capped at $2.5 million through December 31, 2025. Report due end of the first quarter of 2026.
Who qualifies, in full
- Limited by its own tariff to fifty residential customers, in Evergy Missouri West territory only. Evergy Missouri Metro has no equivalent schedule
- IT IS NOT A REBATE: "Evergy will own, install, maintain, and operate a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) on the Customer's premise," and the participant is billed $10.00 per month for it
- Evergy may operate the battery for self-consumption, for charging when energy costs less off-peak, and to manage system load during peak usage — so the dispatch decisions are the utility's, not the household's
- The customer must own the residential property where the battery is installed, and the service must be single phase 120/240V AC meeting the technology provider's electrical and code requirements
- If a participant leaves before the pilot concludes the battery is redeployed to another eligible customer
- THE DATE THAT CLOSED IT: "The RBES Pilot Program is capped at $2.5 million through December 31, 2025." That date has passed
- Evergy was required to file a report at the end of the first quarter of 2026 addressing the pilot's learning objectives, and is barred from filing for any residential battery pilot, any expansion, or any cost recovery for a residential battery program until that report is filed
- NOT VERIFIED HERE: whether Evergy filed that first-quarter 2026 report, what it concluded, and whether any successor residential battery program has been proposed since. The tariff sheet remains on file and we did not find a cancellation
Authority: Evergy Missouri West Schedule RBES, P.S.C. MO. No. 1 Original Sheet Nos. 163 and 163.1, filed under ER-2022-0130
What we saw: TWO SOURCES, RECORDED SEPARATELY BECAUSE THEY DISAGREE. The tariff, re-fetched 2026-09-13: Schedule RBES is still in the Missouri West table of contents as "Residential Battery Energy Storage Pilot RBES", and condition 8 caps the pilot at $2.5 million "through December 31, 2025". The live marketing page at evergy.com/ways-to-save/programs-link/battery-storage-program, read 2026-09-13 and carrying a 2026 copyright, is still soliciting applications: it offers a "FREE 16 kWh home battery storage system valued at $18,000" for a "$10 monthly program fee", says installation began "in Spring of 2024", and says the pilot "ends in 2026". It describes the pilot as running in "both Kansas and Missouri" and does not name Metro or West, and the pilot's own description sites the 50 systems "across Evergy's Missouri jurisdictions with the goal of an equitable customer participation in the MO Metro and MO West service territories", so naming it after the Missouri West tariff book that carries it is right as a cite and may understate its reach. STILL OPEN: whether Evergy filed the first-quarter 2026 report that condition 6 requires. Original tariff read on 2026-07-29 from Evergy Missouri West's complete filed tariff PDF, Original Sheet Nos. 163 and 163.1, issued December 2, 2022, effective January 1, 2023, stamped FILED Missouri Public Service Commission 01/09/2023, ER-2022-0130, YE-2023-0105. Availability verbatim: "This voluntary pilot Program is limited to 50 residential customers meeting the Eligibility requirements below." Programme provisions verbatim: "Evergy will own, install, maintain, and operate a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) on the Customer's premise." Monthly billing: "BESS System $ 10.00 per month". Eligibility item 1: "Customer must own the residential property at which the BESS will be installed". Programme condition 6: "The Company will file a report at the end of the first quarter of 2026 that outlines the results of the pilot and directly addresses the learning objectives that were initially identified." Condition 7: "The Company will not file for any residential battery pilot, expansion of the existing pilot, or otherwise request recovery of a residential battery program until after the report subject to subparagraph 6 above is filed." Condition 8: "The RBES Pilot Program is capped at $2.5 million through December 31, 2025. Shareholders will cover the cost of EM&V." The schedule appears in the tariff's table of contents as "Residential Battery Energy Storage Pilot RBES 163 - 163.1".
Administered by Evergy Missouri West.
Checked against Evergy Missouri West filed tariff, P.S.C. MO. No. 1, Schedule RBES on
Federal residential clean energy credit (§ 25D) — 30% of system cost
30% of cost
Dead, and Missouri has nothing of its own to fall back on — the Department of Revenue's 2025 MO-1040 booklet enumerates every credit an individual may claim and never uses the word solar.
Who qualifies, in full
- Terminated by section 70506(a) of Public Law 119-21, enacted July 4, 2025
- An expenditure is treated as made when the original installation is completed, so paying in 2025 for a system finished in 2026 does not qualify
- Unused credit from a system completed on or before December 31, 2025 still carries forward — file Form 5695 with the 2025 return to preserve it
- Listed here because Missouri has no state income tax credit to replace it: the Department of Revenue's 2025 MO-1040 instruction booklet runs to fifty-three pages, enumerates every credit claimable on Form MO-TC by alpha code and administering agency, and contains the word "solar" zero times
- Worth knowing in Missouri specifically: section 386.890.13 subjects the sale of a generation unit to Missouri's merchandising practices law and authorizes the attorney general to make rules on mandatory seller disclosures. A 2026 pitch still quoting a 30% federal credit, a state property tax exemption or a utility rebate is describing three things Missouri buyers no longer have
Authority: 26 U.S.C. § 25D(h)
What we saw: Read at uscode.house.gov and matched at Cornell LII. § 25D(h): "The credit allowed under this section shall not apply with respect to any expenditures made after December 31, 2025." § 25D(e)(8)(A) treats an expenditure as made when the original installation is completed. § 25D(c) carries excess to the succeeding taxable year; 2025 Instructions for Form 5695 (dated January 22, 2026) state the unused portion carries to 2026 and that the form should be filed even if the credit cannot be used in 2025. The Missouri Department of Revenue's 2025 MO-1040 Individual Income Tax Long Form instruction booklet was downloaded from dor.mo.gov on 2026-07-29 and searched in full: 53 pages, zero occurrences of "solar". The word "energy" occurs once, in the Form MO-TC credit table, as the Missouri Department of Natural Resources' "Processed Wood Energy" credit, alpha code WEC.
Administered by Internal Revenue Service.
Checked against 26 U.S.C. § 25D, U.S. Code (prelim), Office of the Law Revision Counsel on
Missouri's statewide electrical license is optional
Secondary claims about licensing have been wrong in every state on this site that had a license at all, so this one was read from the regulator's own words. Missouri's Office of Statewide Electrical Contractors publishes the answer directly: "No. The statewide electrical contractor license is optional, not mandatory." Office of Statewide Electrical Contractors
A contractor working only in places that do not require a local license, or holding the local license the place does require, does not need the statewide one. Only one person per company needs it, at supervisory level. The state issues no permits and inspects no work — that all stays local. And there is no solar classification and no solar examination anywhere in the scheme.
What that means practically is that in Missouri the binding requirement is municipal, and the useful questions are which local licenses your contractor holds, which authority is going to inspect the job, and whether they have pulled a permit there before. The net metering statute adds one federal-style backstop: before interconnection you must give the supplier a certification from a qualified professional electrician or engineer that the installation meets the code standards.
What changed for Missouri in 2026
The federal residential clean energy credit (§ 25D) stopped applying. With no Missouri income tax credit, no enforceable property tax exemption and no utility rebate, the return on a new Missouri system now rests on the retail electricity you offset inside each billing period plus an avoided fuel cost credit on the remainder.
Evergy's Residential Battery Energy Storage Pilot passed the end of the funding authority in its tariff, which caps the pilot at $2.5 million "through December 31, 2025". Evergy owed the Commission a report at the end of the first quarter of 2026 and may not propose a successor residential battery program until it files it. Evergy's own pilot page, read September 13, 2026, is still recruiting and says the pilot ends in 2026, so the tariff and the marketing page do not agree and both are recorded here.
Evergy Missouri West Schedule RBES, P.S.C. MO. No. 1 Sheet No. 163.1
Senate Bill 4 created a new subclass of tangible personal property for solar panels, racking, inverters and related equipment, assessed at five percent of true value — but only for systems constructed and producing solar energy before August 9, 2022, the date of the Springfield Solar decision. It is a grandfather for systems that were already running, and does nothing for anyone installing today. A separate bill that would have capped solar property tax liability at $500 per megawatt and set a new assessor valuation rule from January 1, 2026 did not pass.
Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 137.080 and 137.115, as amended by S.B. 4 (2025)
Section 393.1030, the Proposition C statute that carried the old rebate schedule, is now printed by the Revisor effective August 28, 2025 under A.L. 2025 S.B. 4. The rebate schedule still ends at zero cents per watt for systems becoming operational after June 30, 2020, so nothing was restored. What is worth reading is subsection 4, which says "Nothing in this section shall prevent an electrical corporation from offering rebates after July 1, 2020, through an approved tariff." The mandate is dead and a voluntary tariff rebate is expressly permitted, which is why the accurate statement is that no Missouri investor-owned utility currently offers one rather than that the law forbids one.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1030.4, Revisor of Statutes of Missouri
Missouri's investor-owned utility solar rebates ended. Section 393.1670, which had required electrical corporations to pay twenty-five cents per watt, expired on December 31, 2023 by its own subsection 7. Evergy Missouri Metro's Schedule SR remains printed in its filed tariff but requires a system to have become operational on or before December 31, 2023.
Liberty, The Empire District Electric Company, stopped offering solar rebates. Its own Missouri solar page states: "As of Aug. 6, 2023, Liberty no longer offers solar rebates." Applications already received and completed had until December 31, 2023 for the system to be operational. Net metering continues under Liberty's Tariff Schedule NM.
The Task Force on Fair, Nondiscriminatory Local Taxation Concerning Solar Energy Systems, created by section 393.1072 to propose a uniform assessment methodology after the Springfield Solar decision, expired by its own terms. The State Tax Commission recorded that no resulting legislation was enacted or effective as of the January 1, 2023 reassessment date.
The Missouri Supreme Court decided Johnson v. Springfield Solar 1, LLC, holding that section 137.100(10) — the exemption for solar energy systems not held for resale — is unconstitutional under article X, section 6 of the Missouri Constitution. The subdivision remains printed in the Revised Statutes with the holding noted beneath it, which is why it is still listed as a live benefit almost everywhere.
The Proposition C statutory solar rebate reached zero. Section 393.1030.4 sets the rebate at "zero cents per watt for systems becoming operational after June 30, 2020," leaving only the separate 2018 rebate statute and any voluntary tariff a utility chose to file.
Missouri voters adopted Proposition C, creating the renewable energy portfolio requirement now in section 393.1030: fifteen percent of sales from renewable energy in every calendar year beginning 2021, at least two percent of it solar, a 1.25 multiplier for energy generated in Missouri, and the rule that certificates from net-metered sources are initially owned by the customer-generator.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 393.1030, adopted by initiative, Proposition C, November 4, 2008
Who is allowed to install solar in Missouri
Missouri has a statewide electrical contractor license and it is optional. Sections 324.900 to 324.945 created the Office of Statewide Electrical Contractors inside the Division of Professional Registration, and the office's own published answer to whether the license is required is: "No. The statewide electrical contractor license is optional, not mandatory. If you work only in places where you are currently licensed, or no license is required, you may not want a statewide electrical contractor license." A contractor operating in a political subdivision that does not require a local license, or that holds the local license that subdivision requires, is not required to hold a statewide one. Only one person in a company needs it, and that person must be at a supervisory level and is responsible for the company's work. The state does not issue permits and does not inspect the work — that stays with the local authority, exactly as before. Where the statewide license does apply, an applicant must carry five hundred thousand dollars of liability insurance, post whatever bond each political subdivision requires, pass a nationally accredited electrical assessment examination based on the National Electrical Code, and meet one of three experience routes. There is no solar classification and no solar examination anywhere in this scheme. What that means in practice for a Missouri homeowner is that the binding requirement is local: the city or county where the work happens sets the licensing rule, issues the permit and inspects the job, and the questions worth asking are which local licenses the contractor holds and which authority will inspect. Missouri's net metering statute reinforces the local layer by requiring every generation unit to meet the standards of any local code authorities alongside the National Electrical Code, the National Electrical Safety Code, the IEEE and Underwriters Laboratories, and by requiring a certification from a qualified professional electrician or engineer before interconnection.
Check a company yourself: Missouri Division of Professional Registration — Licensee Search.
Read from Missouri Division of Professional Registration, Office of Statewide Electrical Contractors on .
So are solar panels worth it in Missouri in 2026?
Better than Indiana, worse than the quote you are probably holding.
A Missouri homeowner installing today gets no federal credit, no state income tax credit and no enforceable property tax exemption. A utility rebate depends entirely on who bills you: a Columbia Water and Light customer can still claim $500 per kW for the first 10 kW, and an Ameren Missouri, Evergy or Liberty customer cannot claim anything. What is left after that is the electricity you generate and use yourself, valued at your own retail rate inside each billing period — and that is genuinely the bulk of the value in any state, which is why Missouri lands ahead of Indiana rather than behind it. Beyond your own consumption the credit drops to avoided fuel cost, which is a fuel-only number rather than an avoided-cost number, and whatever you do not use within twelve months disappears.
The practical consequence is about sizing rather than about whether to buy. In a state with monthly netting, a twelve-month credit expiry and a low export rate, a system sized tightly to your own consumption is worth more per dollar than a system sized to your roof. Ameren publishes the formula it uses to cap system size against your last twelve months of usage, which is a reasonable sanity check on any proposal you are shown regardless of who your utility is.
And treat any Missouri quote whose payback math includes a property tax exemption, a state rebate or a thirty percent federal credit as describing a state that stopped existing between 2020 and 2026. Missouri law subjects the sale of a generation unit to the state's merchandising practices statutes and lets the attorney general make rules about what sellers must disclose, so that is not merely an annoyance — it is the kind of claim the state has an interest in.
What this page does not cover yet
Being explicit about the edges is part of the method. Not yet verified, and therefore not claimed here:
- Columbia Water and Light's rebate above the first 10 kW. The program page states $500 per kW and describes a tiered, performance based rebate and a peak-performance premium above that, but it prints no tier table, no application procedure, no funding pool and no closing date. We have published what the page says and nothing beyond it.
- Whether any Missouri rural electric cooperative pays a rebate. Neither rebate statute ever reached them, so a Columbia-style program is legally possible. The Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives site carries no rebate list and no solar incentive page, and the Public Service Commission net metering page lists no rebate programs. Individual cooperative sites were not swept one by one, and that sweep is queued.
- How Missouri sales tax actually falls on a residential rooftop job. The exemption is written for purchases by a company, and the Department's published ruling on it concerned a utility-scale farm. We will not infer the residential answer in either direction.
- How individual county assessors treat rooftop systems. The State Tax Commission's guidance is discretionary by design — "in the assessor's discretion based upon the facts known to the assessor" — and we did not survey Missouri's counties.
- Whether the 2025 personal property subclass can reach a residential system. It is gated to systems producing before August 9, 2022, it cross-references a provision written around purchases by a company, and the Commission's own guidance treats rooftop panels as a fixture of real property rather than as personal property. Three reasons to doubt it reaches a house, and no primary source resolving it.
- How a Missouri homeowner sells certificates. The compliance demand and the ownership rule are both verified. The registry, the aggregator and the price a household can actually transact at are not.
- How full the five percent cap is at any Missouri utility. This one is different from the others, because in Missouri the number exists. Every regulated supplier must file an annual net metering report stating the number of customer-generator facilities, their total capacity and the total kilowatt-hours received, due April 15 each year and filed publicly. Missouri PSC net metering reports For a first-come, first-served program with an annual throttle inside it, that is the most useful number on offer, and it is queued.
- The avoided fuel cost at Liberty, or at any municipal utility or cooperative. Missouri's statute covers them, which makes their numbers worth having, and each governing body sets its own.
- Whether Evergy filed its first-quarter 2026 battery pilot report, what it concluded, and whether a successor program has been proposed. The tariff sheet is still on file and we found no cancellation.
- Community solar terms at Ameren Missouri or Evergy. Both have subscription offerings and neither was read.
Each of those is queued. When one is verified it will appear above with its own date, and the change will be listed in the record.
Common questions
Does Missouri have a solar property tax exemption?
No, although the statute that grants one is still printed. Section 137.100(10) of the Revised Statutes of Missouri exempts "solar energy systems not held for resale" from property taxation, but the Missouri Supreme Court held that subdivision unconstitutional on August 9, 2022 in Johnson v. Springfield Solar 1, LLC, 648 S.W.3d 101, under article X, section 6 of the Missouri Constitution, which limits tax exemptions to specifically enumerated property. The Revisor prints the holding as an annotation directly beneath the still-present text, which is why the exemption continues to be listed as available almost everywhere. In its place the State Tax Commission tells assessors that rooftop panels may be treated as a fixture of the home whose value is contributory to the overall value of the property and not valued separately, in the assessor's discretion. The full analysis, including the 2025 personal property subclass and the sales tax question, is on its own page.
Is there still an Ameren or Evergy solar rebate in Missouri?
No to both, and two separate statutes have to be read to see why. The Proposition C rebate schedule in section 393.1030.4 steps down over time and ends at "zero cents per watt for systems becoming operational after June 30, 2020." A second statute, section 393.1670, then required twenty-five cents per watt for systems operational through December 31, 2023, and its subsection 7 reads "This section shall expire on December 31, 2023." Ameren Missouri's own rebate document still prints the schedule and its December 31, 2023 operational deadline. Evergy Missouri West's filed tariff table of contents lists every rate schedule on file and contains no solar rebate at all; Evergy Missouri Metro still prints Schedule SR, but that schedule requires a system to have become operational on or before December 31, 2023. Be aware that Evergy's own help center page still describes the rebate in the present tense with no dates and no amount: the filed tariff is the record, not the marketing page. One thing to correct in the way this is usually written: section 393.1030.4 also says "Nothing in this section shall prevent an electrical corporation from offering rebates after July 1, 2020, through an approved tariff," so the mandate is dead but a voluntary rebate is not forbidden. No Missouri investor-owned utility currently has one on file.
Which Missouri utility still pays a solar rebate?
Columbia Water and Light, the municipal utility of the City of Columbia, and as far as we have been able to verify, only Columbia Water and Light. It pays $500 per kW for the first 10 kW, with a tiered and performance based rebate above that and a stated premium for systems designed to perform best during peak periods. Its rebate page publishes no closing date, no funding pool and no waitlist, and we are not going to state tier amounts above 10 kW that the page does not print. The reason this one survived is structural rather than lucky: sections 393.1030 and 393.1670, the two statutes that ended Missouri's utility rebates, both bind an "electrical corporation," which means a Commission-regulated investor-owned utility. A municipally owned electric utility operating under chapter 91 is not an electrical corporation, so neither statute reached it. Rural electric cooperatives sit outside both statutes for the same reason, which makes a cooperative rebate legally possible; we found no cooperative publishing one, and the Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives site has no rebate list at all.
Can you get free solar panels in Missouri?
No. There is no Missouri program that gives a household solar panels for nothing, and there is no federal one either now that section 25D has ended for expenditures made after December 31, 2025. What the phrase usually describes is a lease or a power purchase agreement, where a third party owns the system on your roof and you pay for the power it makes, which is a contract rather than a gift. The nearest thing to free hardware in Missouri is Evergy's residential battery pilot, which installs a 16 kWh battery at no upfront cost for a $10 monthly fee, but the utility owns and dispatches the battery, it is limited to fifty households, and its tariff funding authority ran through December 31, 2025 even though the marketing page is still recruiting. The real money in Missouri is Columbia Water and Light's $500 per kW rebate if you are a Columbia customer, and net metering everywhere else.
How does net metering work in Missouri?
Under the Net Metering and Easy Connection Act, section 386.890, your supplier measures the difference between what it delivers to you and what you deliver to it over the applicable billing period. If it supplied more than you generated, you are billed for the net at ordinary prices for your rate class — that is full retail netting inside the month. If you generated more than it supplied across the whole billing period, the excess is credited at a rate at least equal to avoided fuel cost, applied to the following billing period. Systems are capped at one hundred kilowatts, your supplier may not charge you standby, capacity or interconnection fees a non-generating customer would not pay, and systems of ten kilowatts or less cannot be required to add controls, tests or extra liability insurance beyond the code standards.
Do Missouri credits for excess solar expire?
Yes, and this is the trap most worth knowing. Section 386.890.5(4) provides that any credit "shall expire without any compensation at the earlier of either twelve months after their issuance or when the customer-generator disconnects service or terminates the net metering relationship with the supplier." There is no annual cash-out. That makes system sizing matter more in Missouri than in a state with indefinite carry-forward: production banked in the summer that you have not used within twelve months is simply lost, so a system sized tightly to your own consumption is generally worth more per dollar than one sized to fill your roof.
Does Missouri net metering apply to rural electric cooperatives and city utilities?
Yes, and this is unusual — on most state pages the answer is the opposite. Section 386.890.2(7) defines "retail electric supplier" as "any municipally owned electric utility operating under chapter 91, electrical corporation regulated by the commission under this chapter, or rural electric cooperative operating under chapter 394 that provides retail electric service in this state." Every duty in the Act runs to that term, so co-op members and municipal utility customers get the same entitlement. The catch is the rate rather than the right: "avoided fuel cost" is set by "the governing body with jurisdiction," which for a cooperative or a city utility is its own board or council rather than the Public Service Commission. So ask your supplier what its avoided fuel cost is — we have not read any individual cooperative's or municipal's figure.
Does Missouri solar net metering transfer when I sell my house?
No. Section 386.890.7(2) provides that "upon the change in ownership of a qualified electric energy generation unit, the new customer-generator shall be responsible for filing a new application." That is a genuine difference from states like Indiana, where a grandfathered tariff passes to a successor in interest at the same premises and is therefore an asset worth disclosing in a sale. In Missouri the buyer files fresh, subject to whatever the interconnection queue and the statutory caps look like on the day they apply. It is worth raising before closing rather than after.
Does Missouri have a state solar tax credit?
No. The Missouri Department of Revenue's 2025 MO-1040 Individual Income Tax Long Form instruction booklet runs to fifty-three pages and contains the Form MO-TC credit table, which enumerates every credit an individual may claim by alpha code and administering agency. Across the entire booklet the word "solar" appears zero times, and the only occurrence of "energy" is the Department of Natural Resources' Processed Wood Energy credit. With the federal section 25D credit also gone for expenditures made after December 31, 2025, a Missouri homeowner buying a system in 2026 receives no income tax credit from either government.
Can I sell SRECs in Missouri?
Missouri is one of the few states where the answer is not simply no, and we want to be careful about how far we take it. Proposition C, now section 393.1030, requires at least fifteen percent of each utility's sales to come from renewable energy in every calendar year beginning 2021, with no later benchmark and no termination date, and at least two percent of that requirement must be solar. Energy generated in Missouri counts at 1.25 kilowatt-hours per kilowatt-hour. And subsection 3 says "Certificates from net-metered sources shall initially be owned by the customer-generator" — both Evergy Missouri tariffs repeat it. So the demand exists and the certificates are yours, unless you took a solar rebate, which transferred them to the utility for ten years. What we have not verified is how a household actually registers and sells them: which registry, which aggregator, at what price. Until we have read that, we are not going to imply a market you can reach.
Is there a sales tax exemption for solar in Missouri?
There is an exemption, but read who it is written for. Section 144.030.2(46) exempts "all purchases by a company of solar photovoltaic energy systems, components used to construct a solar photovoltaic energy system, and all purchases of materials and supplies used directly to construct or make improvements to such systems," provided the systems are sold or leased to an end user or are used to produce, collect and transmit electricity for resale or retail. The Department of Revenue has applied it in a published letter ruling whose facts were a utility-scale solar farm, and that ruling says nothing about a homeowner. How Missouri sales tax finally falls on a residential rooftop job is something we have not established from a primary source, so we do not claim it in either direction. The full reading of the provision and the ruling is here.
Does a solar installer need a license in Missouri?
Not a state one, necessarily. Missouri created an Office of Statewide Electrical Contractors under sections 324.900 to 324.945, and its own published answer to whether the license is required is: "No. The statewide electrical contractor license is optional, not mandatory." A contractor who works only where no license is required, or who holds the local license that a political subdivision requires, does not need the statewide one. Only one person in a company needs it, at supervisory level. The state issues no permits and inspects no work — that stays with the local authority. There is no solar classification and no solar examination. So the binding requirement in Missouri is municipal: ask which local licenses your contractor holds and which authority will inspect the job. Before interconnection, the net metering statute separately requires a certification from a qualified professional electrician or engineer.
How full is Missouri's net metering cap?
We do not know yet, but unlike most states Missouri makes the number knowable, and that is worth explaining. Net metering must be offered first-come, first-served until enrolled capacity reaches five percent of the supplier's single-hour peak load in the previous year. Inside that there is a second limit: no supplier need approve further interconnections in a calendar year once that year's approvals reach one percent of the previous year's peak — so a utility's queue can close for a year while the five percent headroom is still unfilled. Section 386.890.8 then requires every supplier to report annually the total number of customer-generator facilities, their total estimated capacity and the total kilowatt-hours received, and the regulated utilities file those reports with the Public Service Commission by April 15 each year. The figures are public. We have not pulled the current ones, and it is on the queue at the foot of this page.
Does Missouri law treat leased solar differently?
Yes, and in the homeowner's favor, which makes Missouri the mirror image of Indiana. Section 386.890.2(3) defines a "customer-generator" as "the owner or operator" of a qualified generation unit, located on a premises "owned, operated, leased, or otherwise controlled by the customer-generator." Both halves are permissive and the word "leased" is in the statutory text rather than something you would have to argue for. Indiana, by contrast, puts "owned by the customer" in the definition of the thing its statute compensates. We are stating what Missouri's definition says rather than predicting how any particular lease or power purchase agreement would be treated, but a Missouri homeowner weighing third-party ownership starts from friendlier language than most.
Are solar panels worth it in Missouri in 2026?
Better than in Indiana, and worse than most Missouri quotes suggest. There is no federal credit, no state income tax credit and no enforceable property tax exemption, and whether there is a utility rebate depends entirely on who bills you: Columbia Water and Light still pays $500 per kW for the first 10 kW, and Ameren Missouri, Evergy and Liberty pay nothing. What remains everywhere is the electricity you generate and consume yourself, valued at your own retail rate inside each billing period, which is the bulk of the value of a residential system in any state, and it is why Missouri lands ahead of states that pay only a wholesale-derived export rate. Beyond your own consumption the credit falls to avoided fuel cost, a fuel-only figure, and anything unused expires after twelve months. The practical consequence is about sizing: in a state with monthly netting, a twelve-month expiry and a low export rate, a system matched to your own consumption is worth more per dollar than one matched to your roof. Any payback figure that includes a property tax exemption, a state rebate or a thirty percent federal credit is describing a Missouri that stopped existing between 2020 and 2026.